Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  595 692 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 595 692 Next Page
Page Background

for GUVCA. Sopko and colleagues

[7]

have elegantly used an

established model for peripheral mononuclear blood cell

(PMBC) activation called the mixed lymphocyte reaction

(MLR) to study whether allogenic blood cells are indeed

activated by contact with corpus cavernosum tissue, which

was harvested from patients undergoing penile prosthesis

implantation. In a small cohort of 10 tissue samples, they

illustrate that coculturing of allogenic—but not autolo-

gous—cavernosum tissue induces a global increase in

transplant-associated gene expression in PMBCs, and that

these changes are prevented by the addition of cyclosporine

A to the culture system. Conversely, histomorphometric

analysis of the cavernous tissue, both in fixed tissue as in

live imaging experiments, showed an influx of inflamma-

tory cells in allograft MLR, but not in autologous MLR, and

apoptosis was frequently seen in cavernous nerves and

smooth muscle cells in the cavernous tissues subjected to

allograft MLR. While it can be argued that these findings are

predictable, the authors interestingly performed functional

assays looking at in-vitro contractility of human cavernous

tissue, again after coincubation with PMBCs, and found that

allo-transplantation reduces contraction, and to a lesser

degree relaxation, in response to electrical field stimulation.

This is in contrast with findings in in-vivo transplant models

of the heart for example, where vasoconstriction of the

coronary arteries was found in vivo but could not be

elucidated in vitro

[8]

. The exact mechanisms behind these

observations remain to be thoroughly investigated but may

include apoptosis of smooth muscle but also alterations in

contractile state as a result of release of a variety of

vasoactive compounds during the inflammatory reaction

[8,9]

. The impaired contractile and relaxant function of the

cavernous strips in vitro was rather contrarily worsened by

cyclosporine treatment, which may be a direct effect, as the

authors state that long term use of cyclosporine indeed

results in the development of hypertension and the

impairment of erectile function.

While these experiments provide preliminary clues on

the effects of both rejection and immunosuppression on

erectile tissue, the conclusions must be strengthened and

evidence expanded whilst working up a GUVCA clinical

protocol. First, in a sample size of 10 any confounding factor

can have a major impact. What is the effect of culturing

tissues ex-vivo on their contractility? This question may be

answered by adding an appropriate control (eg, freshly

isolated or noncultured tissue). Furthermore, the conclu-

sions are partially based on quantitative data (apoptosis,

leukocyte infiltration, and live laser confocal microscopy

experiments), which ideally should be confirmed by

performing quantitative molecular experiments such as

quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Additionally, the

experimental design gives clues on what immunological

reactions and effects thereof can be expected in the

hyperacute and acute phase, but not beyond these phases.

Whilst, as the authors correctly stated, in-vivo experiments

in previously described models do not allow for conclusions

on function, the isolated ex-vivo approach also has inherent

drawbacks as it does not mimic the complex in-vivo

environment and is less likely to adapt to externally

inflicted changes and injuries.

Notwithstanding these limitations inherent to the

disorder studied and the experimental design, the authors

are to be commended on their excellent achievement as

they, for the first time, give clues on the immunologic

complexity of allogeneic penile transplantation and the

effects thereof on erectile function. As part of a broader

project, this translational research endeavor helps to pave

the way for the many men who have been inspired by few

anecdotal stories, which have received unparalleled cover-

age of the lay press.

Conflicts of interest:

The author has nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgments:

Nikolai Sopko will highlight their findings and the

penile transplant development program at Johns Hopkins University

during the European Society of Sexual Medicine congress in Nice, France,

which will be held February 2–4, 2017.

References

[1]

Hu W, Lu J, Zhang L, et al. A preliminary report of penile transplan- tation. Eur Urol 2006;50:851–3.

[2]

Hu W, Lu J, Zhang L, et al. A preliminary report of penile transplan- tation: part 2. Eur Urol 2006;50:1115–6.

[3]

Bateman C. World’s first successful penis transplant at Tygerberg Hospital. S Afr Med J 2015;105:251–2.

[4] Massachusetts General Hospital. First genitourinary vascularized

composite allograft (penile) transplant in the nation performed at

Massachusetts General Hospital.

http://www.massgeneral.org/ News/pressrelease.aspx?id=1937 .

[5] Hoebeke P. Re: Weilie Hu, Jun Lu, Lichao Zhang, et al. A preliminary

report of penile transplantation. Eur Urol 2006;50:851-3. Eur Urol

2007;51:1146-7.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.032

.

[6]

Brandacher G, Lee WP, Schneeberger S. Minimizing immunosuppres- sion in hand transplantation. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2012 Sep;8: 673–83.

[7]

Sopko NA, Matsui H, Lough DM, et al. Ex vivo model of human penile transplantation and rejection: implications for erectile tissue physi- ology. Eur Urol 2017;71:584–93.

[8]

Pearson PJ, Wei CM, Lin PJ, et al. Endothelium-dependent vasodila- tion during acute rejection in dogs. J Surg Res 2004;121:56–61.

[9]

Cable DG, Hisamochi K, Schaff HV. A model of xenograft hyperacute rejection attenuates endothelial nitric oxide production: a mecha- nism for graft vasospasm? J Heart Lung Transplant 1999;18:177–84.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 5 9 4 – 5 9 5

595