Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  600 692 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 600 692 Next Page
Page Background

patient selection domain

( Fig. 3

). The majority of studies

(17/21 studies) were judged to be at low RoB for index test

and reference standard domains.

3.4.

DTA results

Table 1

presents the DTA results for each study separately,

together with the number of patients included, D’Amico risk

classification, PLND template, median number of SNs and

LNs retrieved, and percentage of LN-positive patients who

only had metastatic SN(s). Only a few studies used the

standardized definitions and criteria for DTA; the majority

used nonstandardized definitions to calculate their DTA

elements, in which case the results were recalculated using

standardized definitions using the raw data provided. The

median NDR across studies was 4.1% (IQR 1.5–10.7%),

sensitivity 95.2% (IQR 81.8–100%), specificity 100% (IQR

95.0–100%), PPV 100% (IQR 87.0–100%), NPV 98.0% (IQR

[(Fig._3)TD$FIG]

Fig. 3 – Risk of bias for the studies included according to QUADAS-2. Reference numbers are as in

Table 1

.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 5 9 6 – 6 0 5

600