Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  566 692 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 566 692 Next Page
Page Background

validation in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. In

addition, radiographic lymphadenopathy was recorded from

medical records; accordingly, a specific size threshold could

not be applied, and we could not adjust for the number of

radiographically enlarged nodes. Furthermore, the location

of positive nodes was not available. Finally, exclusion of

patients whose PS was outside the common range may

reduce statistical power and exclude the highest-risk

patients who may potentially benefit from LND, and even

the use of PS techniques cannot adjust for unmeasured

confounding. Still, this study benefits from a large cohort

with long-term follow-up, relatively high utilization of LND

(34%), and the use of PS techniques to adjust for measured

confounding related to nonrandom treatment allocation.

5.

Conclusions

LND was not associated with improved oncologic outcomes

in the overall cohort or among patients at increased risk of

nodal disease. Similarly, there was no association between

the extent of LND and survival. These findings do not support

a therapeutic benefit to LND in patients with M0 RCC.

Author contributions:

Bradley C. Leibovich had full access to all the data

in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the

accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design:

Gershman, Thompson, Moreira, Boorjian,

Tollefson, Lohse, Costello, Cheville, Leibovich.

Acquisition of data:

Lohse, Thompson, Leibovich.

Analysis and interpretation of data:

Gershman, Thompson, Moreira,

Boorjian, Tollefson, Lohse, Costello, Cheville, Leibovich.

Drafting of the manuscript:

Gershman, Lohse, Leibovich.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content:

Gershman, Thompson, Moreira, Boorjian, Tollefson, Lohse, Costello,

Cheville, Leibovich.

Statistical analysis:

Lohse.

Obtaining funding:

None.

Administrative, technical, or material support:

None.

Supervision:

Thompson, Leibovich.

Other:

None.

Financial disclosures:

Bradley C. Leibovich certifies that all conflicts of

interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and

affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the

manuscript(eg,employment/affiliation,grantsorfunding,consultancies,

honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, or

patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: None.

Funding/Support and role of the sponsor:

None.

Acknowledgments:

This publication was made possible by the Clinical

and Translational Science Award Grant UL1 TR000135 from the National

Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, a component of the

National Institutes of Health. Its contents are solely the responsibility

of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the

National Institutes of Health.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data associated with this article can be

found, in the online version, at

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. eururo.2016.09.019 .

References

[1]

Briganti A, Blute ML, Eastham JH, et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2009;55:1251–65.

[2]

Bruins HM, Veskimae E, Hernandez V, et al. The impact of the extent of lymphadenectomy on oncologic outcomes in patients undergo- ing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2014;66:1065–77

.

[3]

Protzel C, Alcaraz A, Horenblas S, Pizzocaro G, Zlotta A, Hakenberg OW. Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer. Eur Urol 2009;55:1075–88.

[4]

Blom JH, van Poppel H, Marechal JM, et al. Radical nephrectomy with and without lymph-node dissection: final results of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) ran- domized phase 3 trial 30881. Eur Urol 2009;55:28–34.

[5]

Delacroix Jr SE, Chapin BF, Chen JJ, et al. Can a durable disease-free survival be achieved with surgical resection in patients with pathological node positive renal cell carcinoma? J Urol 2011;186: 1236–41.

[6]

Pantuck AJ, Zisman A, Dorey F, et al. Renal cell carcinoma with retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Impact on survival and benefits of immunotherapy Cancer 2003;97:2995–3002.

[7]

Vasselli JR, Yang JC, Linehan WM, White DE, Rosenberg SA, Walther MM. Lack of retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy predicts survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2001;166: 68–72.

[8]

Whitson JM, Harris CR, Reese AC, Meng MV. Lymphadenectomy improves survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma and nodal metastases. J Urol 2011;185:1615–20

.

[9]

Capitanio U, Becker F, Blute ML, et al. Lymph node dissection in renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2011;60:1212–20.

[10]

Pantuck AJ, Zisman A, Dorey F, et al. Renal cell carcinoma with retroperitoneal lymph nodes: role of lymph node dissection. J Urol 2003;169:2076–83.

[11]

Herrlinger A, Schrott KM, Schott G, Sigel A. What are the benefits of extended dissection of the regional renal lymph nodes in the therapy of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1991;146:1224–7

.

[12]

Schafhauser W, Ebert A, Brod J, Petsch S, Schrott KM. Lymph node involvement in renal cell carcinoma and survival chance by systematic lymphadenectomy. Anticancer Res 1999;19: 1573–8.

[13]

Capitanio U, Suardi N, Matloob R, et al. Extent of lymph node dissection at nephrectomy affects cancer-specific survival and metastatic progression in specific sub-categories of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). BJU Int 2014;114:210–5

.

[14]

Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 2015;67:913–24.

[15]

Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N, et al. Kidney cancer, version 3.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2015;13:151–9

.

[16]

D’Agostino Jr RB. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 1998;17:2265–81

.

[17]

Terrone C, Guercio S, De Luca S, et al. The number of lymph nodes examined and staging accuracy in renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2003;91:37–40

.

[18]

Margulis V, Wood CG. The role of lymph node dissection in renal cell carcinoma: the pendulum swings back. Cancer J 2008;14: 308–14

.

[19]

Karakiewicz PI, Trinh QD, Bhojani N, et al. Renal cell carcinoma with nodal metastases in the absence of distant metastatic disease: prognostic indicators of disease-specific survival. Eur Urol 2007;51:1616–24.

[20]

Minervini A, Lilas L, Morelli G, et al. Regional lymph node dissection in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: is it useful in patients with

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 5 6 0 – 5 6 7

566