Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  562 692 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 562 692 Next Page
Page Background [16]

. Forty-six patients were excluded from PS calculation due to missing

data (14 with and 32 without LND), and 110 had a PS that did not fall

within the common range (69 with and 41 without LND). A total of

1641 patients formed the cohort for PS analysis, including 523 (32%) who

underwent LND. Sixty-four patients were missing the cause of death

(16 with and 48 without LND) and were therefore excluded from

analyses of cancer-specific mortality (CSM). For PS matching, there were

153 patients who underwent LND (including 40 cN1 patients and

57 with predicted probability of pN1 0.20) for whom suitable matched

pairs could not be found as described in the Supplementary data, leaving

370 matched pairs for analysis.

The associations of LND with the development of distant metastases,

CSM, and all-cause mortality (ACM) were evaluated with Cox models

using several PS techniques, and summarized with hazard ratios (HRs)

and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). PS techniques included 1:1 PS

matching (

n

= 370 matched pairs), adjustment for PS quintile, stratifica-

tion by PS quintile, and reweighting using stabilized inverse probability

weights (IPWs) as described in the Supplementary data. HRs for

stratified analyses were obtained by pooling estimates obtained within

each PS quintile, and HRs for the subset of 370 matched pairs were

obtained by stratifying on the matched sets. In models further adjusted

for the surgeon, similar results were obtained (data not shown). To

incorporate patients excluded from PS analysis, we also performed

traditional Cox multivariable regression for the 1751 patients with

nonmissing data, adjusting for all covariates used to estimate the PS.

Reasoning that patients at increased risk of LN metastases may

particularly benefit from LND, we conducted several analyses to further

evaluate the association of LND with oncologic outcomes among

patients at increased risk of pN1 disease. To do so, we constructed

Cox models, adjusted using PS techniques, which included an indicator

for LND, an indicator for risk of pN1 disease, and the interaction term

between the two. We considered patients with preoperative radio-

graphic lymphadenopathy (cN1) as well as patients with threshold

probabilities for pN1 disease ranging from 0.05 to 0.50 at increased risk of

pN1 disease. Predicted probabilities for pN1 disease were estimated by

constructing amultivariable logistic regressionmodel fromthe 606 patients

Table 1 (

Continued

)

Original cohort (

N

= 1797)

Pseudo cohort (

N

= 1637)

No LND

(

N

= 1191)

LND

(

N

= 606)

p

value

No LND

(

N

= 1102)

LND

(

N

= 535)

p

value

3

18 (2)

8 (1)

18 (2)

10 (2)

4

3 (

<

1)

0

2 (

<

1)

0

cN1

11 (1)

108 (18)

<

0.001

37 (3)

18 (3)

0.96

Renal vein involvement on CT/MRI

87 (7)

189 (31)

<

0.001

147 (13)

71 (13)

0.94

IVC tumor thrombus on CT/MRI

56 (5)

117 (19)

<

0.001

98 (9)

45 (8)

0.77

Radiographic evidence of:

Hemorrhage

24 (2)

15 (2)

0.53

28 (3)

17 (3)

0.40

Necrosis

71 (6)

91 (15)

<

0.001

101 (9)

52 (10)

0.74

Calcification

76 (6)

65 (11)

0.001

81 (7)

44 (8)

0.57

Extrarenal extension

32 (3)

90 (15)

<

0.001

51 (5)

26 (5)

0.81

Neovascularity

71 (6)

99 (16)

<

0.001

87 (8)

40 (7)

0.79

Adrenal involvement

8 (1)

7 (1)

0.29

6 (1)

4 (1)

0.58

Cystic or indeterminate cysts

254 (21)

78 (13)

<

0.001

197 (18)

102 (19)

0.53

Neoadjuvant treatment

0

4 (1)

0.01

0

1 (

<

1)

0.13

Type of surgery

[25_TD$DIFF]

<

0.001

0.57

Open radical nephrectomy

1,005 (84)

569 (94)

[2_TD$DIFF]

967 (88)

475 (89)

[10_TD$DIFF]

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy

186 (16)

37 (6)

135 (12)

60 (11)

RCC histologic subtype

[26_TD$DIFF]

0.006

0.27

Clear cell

942 (79)

507 (84)

885 (80)

428 (80)

Papillary

162 (14)

49 (8)

[11_TD$DIFF]

127 (12)

66 (12)

[12_TD$DIFF]

Chromophobe

68 (6)

35 (6)

65 (6)

33 (6)

Collecting duct

2 (

<

1)

5 (1)

2 (

<

1)

3 (1)

Not otherwise specified

13 (1)

6 (1)

18 (2)

2 (

<

1)

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell

1 (

<

1)

0

1 (

<

1)

0

Translocation-associated

[13_TD$DIFF]

1 (

<

1)

0

1 (

<

1)

0

[27_TD$DIFF]

Clear cell papillary

2 (

<

1)

4 (1)

3 (

<

1)

3 (1)

2010 pT (

N

= 1785)

[28_TD$DIFF]

<

0.001

0.79

pT1a

340 (29)

36 (6)

222 (20)

106 (20)

pT1b

352 (30)

84 (14)

[2_TD$DIFF]

293 (27)

151 (28)

[14_TD$DIFF]

pT2a

152 (13)

81 (13)

153 (14)

70 (13)

pT2b

65 (6)

66 (11)

76 (7)

36 (7)

pT3a

210 (18)

218 (36)

253 (23)

123 (23)

pT3b

41 (3)

91 (15)

71 (6)

34 (6)

pT3c

11 (1)

13 (2)

17 (2)

8 (1)

pT4

9 (1)

16 (3)

17 (2)

7 (1)

Grade

[29_TD$DIFF]

<

0.001

0.27

1

75 (6)

12 (2)

57 (5)

22 (4)

2

590 (50)

154 (25)

[2_TD$DIFF]

465 (42)

218 (41)

[12_TD$DIFF]

3

460 (39)

310 (51)

487 (44)

246 (46)

4

66 (6)

130 (21)

93 (8)

49 (9)

Coagulative tumor necrosis (

N

= 1796)

309 (26)

308 (51)

<

0.001

351 (32)

182 (34)

0.36

Sarcomatoid differentiation

29 (2)

42 (7)

<

0.001

35 (3)

20 (4)

0.53

BMI = body mass index; CT = computed tomography; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IQR = interquartile range; MRI = magnetic resonance

imaging; RCC = renal cell carcinoma.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 5 6 0 – 5 6 7

562