Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  503 692 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 503 692 Next Page
Page Background

predominant mixed UI, and no high-grade prolapse),

performing urodynamics does not improve surgical

outcome. However, currently there is no better test to

evaluate bladder function than urodynamic or videour-

odynamic testing, and in patients with complicated UI and

those who do not respond to first-line therapies, urody-

namics may provide valuable information that can guide

management and improve both patient and physician

confidence in prescribed therapies.

Conflicts of interest:

Gary E. Lemack is a stock shareholder of Pfizer, a

company consultant for Medtronic, has received company speaker

honoraria from Astellas and Allergan, and is a trial participant for

Sophiris. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgments:

The authors would like to thank the other members

of the EAU Urinary Incontinence guideline panel for their comments and

suggestions: Mr. M. Lucas, Prof. A. Tubaro, Prof. F. Cruz, Prof. J.L.H.R.

Bosch, and Mr. N. Thiruchelvam. We would also like to thank Miss Karin

Plass and the other members of the EAU Guidelines Office team for their

ongoing efforts and support.

References

[1]

Davis DM. The hydrodynamics of the upper urinary tract (urody- namics). Ann Surg 1954;140:839–49,

[6_TD$DIFF]

PMCID: PMC1609699.

[2] Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. IUGA/ICS joint report on

the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Uro-

dyn 2010;29:4–20

. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.20798 .

[3] Winters JC, Dmochowski RR, Goldman HB, et al. Urodynamic studies

in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol 2012;188:2464–72

. http://dx. doi.org/

[7_TD$DIFF]

10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.081 .

[4] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Urinary inconti-

nence in women: management. NICE guideline CG171. NICE; 2013.

[5] Burkhard FC, Lucas MG, Berghmans LC, et al. EAU guidelines on urinary

incontinence. Arnhem The Netherlands: European Association of

Urology 2016

[8_TD$DIFF]

http://uroweb.org/guideline/urinary-incontinence/

[6] Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, et al. A randomized trial of urody-

namic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med

2012;366:1987–97

. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1113595

.

[7] van Leijsen SAL, Kluivers KB, Mol BW, et al. Value of urodynamics

before stress urinary incontinence surgery: a randomized controlled

trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:999–1008

. http://dx.doi.org/

[

9

_

T

D

$

D

I

F

F

]

10. 1097/AOG.0b013e31828c68e3 .

[8] Brostrom S, Jennum P, Lose G. Short-term reproducibility of cysto-

metry and pressure-flow micturition studies in healthy women.

Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:457

. http://dx.doi.org/

[

1

0

_

T

D

$

D

I

F

F

]

10.1002/nau. 10019 .

[9] Clement KD, Lapitan MCM, Omar MI, Glazener CMA. Urodynamic

studies for management of urinary incontinence in children and

adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;2013:CD003195

. http://dx. doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003195.pub3 .

[(Fig._1)TD$FIG]

Complicated urinary incontinence

UI associated with genitourinary prolapse

Mixed UI (equally bothersome stress and urgency UI)

Previous surgery for UI

Neurogenic bladder dysfunction

UI associated with known structural abnormality of the urinary tract

Continuous UI (suspected ϐistula or urethral diverticulum)

Fig. 1 – What is meant by

complicated urinary incontinence

. Repeated reference is made in the text to uncomplicated urinary incontinence (UI), so it is

useful to clarify what is meant by complicated UI, and by extension the type of cases for which urodynamics may be of significant benefit.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 5 0 1 – 5 0 3

503