Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  631 692 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 631 692 Next Page
Page Background

1.

Introduction

A prior summary of the European Association of Urology

(EAU) Guidelines on prostate cancer (PCa) was published in

2013

[1] .

This paper summarises the many changes that

have occurred in the treatment of metastatic, relapsing, and

castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) over the past 3 yr. The

Guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and treatment of

clinically localised and locally advanced PCa were published

in a separate paper

[2] .

To facilitate evaluation of the quality

of the information provided, levels of evidence (LEs) and

grades of recommendation (GRs) have been inserted

according to the general principles of evidence-based

medicine

[3] .

2.

Diagnosis and treatment of relapse after curative

therapies

Physicians treating patients with prostate-specific antigen

(PSA)–only recurrence face a difficult set of decisions in

attempting to delay the onset of metastatic disease and

death while avoiding overtreatment of patients whose

disease may never affect their overall survival (OS) or

quality of life (QoL). It has to be emphasised that treatment

recommendations for these patients should be given after

discussion with a multidisciplinary team.

2.1.

Definitions

Following radical prostatectomy (RP), biochemical recur-

rence (BCR) is defined by two consecutive rising PSA

values

>

0.2 ng/ml

[4]

. After primary radiation therapy

(RT), the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and

American Society for Radiation Oncology Phoenix Con-

sensus Conference definition of PSA failure is any PSA

increase 2 ng/ml higher than the PSA nadir value,

regardless of the serum concentration of the nadir

[5]

. Importantly, patients with PSA recurrence after RP

or primary RT have different risks of subsequent PCa-

specific mortality. For both groups, however, men with a

PSA doubling time (PSA DT) of

<

3 mo, stage T3b or higher,

Gleason score 8–10, and time to BCR of

<

3 yr represent a

subgroup with a high risk of developing metastases and

dying from PCa

[6–9]

.

2.2.

Staging

Because biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP or RT

precedes clinical metastases by 7–8 yr on average, the

diagnostic yield of common imaging techniques is poor in

asymptomatic patients

[10]

.

In men with PSA-only relapse after RP, the probability of

a positive bone scan is

<

5% if the PSA level is

<

7 ng/ml

[11]

. Consequently, bone scan and abdominopelvic com-

puted tomography (CT) should be considered only for

patients with BCR after RP who have a high baseline PSA

(

>

10 ng/ml) or high PSA kinetics (PSA DT

<

6 mo) or in

patients with symptoms of bone disease

[11]

. Although its

sensitivity is low when the PSA level is

<

1 ng/ml, choline

positron emission tomography (PET)/CT may be helpful

in selecting patients for salvage therapy after

[1_TD$DIFF]

RP

[12]

,

especially if PSA DT is

<

6 mo

[13] .

Salvage RT (SRT) after RP

is usually decided on the basis of BCR, without imaging.

In patients with BCR after RT, the biopsy status is a major

predictor of outcome, provided the biopsies are obtained

18–24 mo after treatment. Given the morbidity of local

salvage options, it is necessary to obtain histologic proof of

the local recurrence before treating the patient

[10] .

Multi-

parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has yielded

excellent results in detecting local recurrences

[10,14]

and

can be used for biopsy targeting and guidance of local

salvage treatment. Detection of local recurrence is also

feasible with choline and acetate PET/CT, but PET/CT has

poorer spatial resolution than MRI

[15,16]

.

2.3.

Management of prostate-specific antigen relapse following

radical prostatectomy

Early SRT provides a possibility of cure for patients with an

increasing PSA after RP. More than 60% of patients who are

treated before the PSA level rises to

>

0.5 ng/ml will achieve

an undetectable PSA level

[17]

, providing patients with an

80% chance of being progression-free 5 yr later

[18]

. The

addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to salvage

treatment of CRPC following docetaxel. Zoledronic acid and denosumab can be used in men

with mCRPC and osseous metastases to prevent skeletal-related complications.

Conclusions:

The knowledge in the field of advanced and metastatic PCa and CRPC is

changing rapidly. The 2016 EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on PCa summarise the most recent

findings and advice for use in clinical practice. These PCa guidelines are the first endorsed by

the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the International Society

of Geriatric Oncology and reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. A full

version is available from the EAU office or online (

http://uroweb.org/guideline/ prostate-cancer/

).

Patient summary:

In men with a rise in their PSA levels after prior local treatment for

prostate cancer only, it is important to balance overtreatment against further progression of

the disease since survival and quality of life may never be affected inmany of these patients.

For patients diagnosed with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer, several new

drugs have become available which may provide a clear survival benefit but the optimal

choice will have to be made on an individual basis.

#

2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 6 3 0 – 6 4 2

631