Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  629 692 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 629 692 Next Page
Page Background of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol 2009;181:956–62.

[81]

Fossati N, Karnes RJ, Cozzarini C, et al. Assessing the optimal timing for early salvage radiation therapy in patients with prostate-spe- cific antigen rise after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2016;69: 728–33.

[82]

Wallis CJ, Mahar AL, Choo R, et al. Second malignancies after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: systematic review and meta- analysis. BMJ 2016;352:i851.

[83]

Ash D, Flynn A, Battermann J, et al. ESTRO/EAU/EORTC recommen- dations on permanent seed implantation for localized prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2000;57:315–21.

[84]

Grimm P, Billiet I, Bostwick D, et al. Comparative analysis of prostate-specific antigen free survival outcomes for patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treatment by radical therapy. Results from the Prostate Cancer Results Study Group. BJU Int 2012;109(Suppl 1):22–9.

[85]

Buda¨us L, Bolla M, Bossi A, et al. Functional outcomes and compli- cations following radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2012;61:112–27

.

[86]

Martens C, Pond G, Webster D, et al. Relationship of the Interna- tional Prostate Symptom score with urinary flow studies, and catheterization rates following 125I prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2006;5:9–13.

[87]

Vordermark D, Wulf J, Markert K, et al. 3-D conformal treatment of prostate cancer to 74 Gy vs. high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost: a cross-sectional quality-of-life survey. Acta Oncol 2006;45:708–16

.

[88]

Hoskin PJ, Columbo A, Henry A, et al. GEC/ESTRO recommendations on high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer: an update. Radiother Oncol 2013;107:325–32

.

[89]

Ramsay CR, Adewuyi TE, Gray J, et al. Ablative therapy for people with localised prostate cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2015;19:1–490.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 6 1 8 – 6 2 9

629