Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  573 692 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 573 692 Next Page
Page Background

3.5.

Oxybutynin plus ABs versus ABs alone

One 12-wk trial (

n

= 420) trial compared oxybutynin 10 mg

tablets plus tamsulosin 0.4 mg with tamsulosin 0.4 mg

alone

[27]

. Individuals with a baseline postvoid residual of

>

200 ml were excluded. RoB was moderate. SOE was

judged insufficient for all outcomes.

3.6.

Solifenacin plus ABs versus ABs alone

Seven 12-wk trials

[28–34]

randomized men with LUTS and

OAB symptoms (

n

= 3147) to solifenacin plus tamsulosin

versus tamsulosin monotherapy

( Table 1

). Five trials

examined solifenacin 5 mg

[28–31,34]

and two examined

solifenacin 6 mg

[32,33]

. The overall RoB was moderate.

Combination therapy was similar to AB monotherapy

in improving LUTS (moderate SOE;

Table 4

). Improvement in

mean I-PSS score from baseline was similar with solifenacin

5 mg or 6 mg plus tamsulosin 0.2 mg or 0.4 mg versus

tamsulosin alone (WMD: –0.29, 95% CI: –0.88 to 0.30;

moderate SOE). Combination therapy lowered I-PSS QoL

score more than tamsulosin, but the difference between

groups was not clinically significant based on predetermined

thresholds (moderate SOE). Evidence from four trials using

solifenacin 3–9 mg

[29,32–34]

reported no statistical

difference between treatment groups in rates of AUR, but

evidence was judged insufficient to draw conclusions due to

imprecision.

Withdrawal for any reason or due to AEs was similar

with both treatments (low SOE). More participants reported

Table 1 – Baseline characteristics of eligible comparative effectiveness trials

Study, [reference]/location

Intervention

(daily dosage)

Control

(daily dosage)

No.

randomized

Duration

(wk)

Mean

Age (yr)

Mean

I-PSS

Alpha-blockers, silodosin versus tamsulosin

Takeshita (2016)

[21]

/Japan

Silodosin 4 mg

Tamsulosin 0.2 mg

34

4 wk

s a

70

16

Manjunatha (2016)

[22]

/India

Silodosin 8 mg

Tamsulosin 0.4 mg

60

12 wks

64

19

Pande (2014)

[13] /

India

Silodosin 8 mg

Tamsulosin 0.4 mg

61

12 wk

62

18

Chapple (2011)

[18]

/Europe

Silodosin 8 mg

Tamsulosin 0.4 mg

765

12 wk

66

19

Yokoyama (2012)

[14]

/Japan

Silodosin 8 mg

Tamsulosin 0.2 mg

46

12 w

k a

69

20

Watanabe (2011)

[17]

/Japan

Silodosin 8 mg

Tamsulosin 0.2 mg

102

4 w

k a

70

17

Yokoyama (2011)

[16]

/Japan

Silodosin 8 mg

Tamsulosin 0.2 mg

90

12 wk

71

18

Yu (2011)

[15]

/Taiwan

Silodosin 8 mg

Tamsulosin 0.2 mg

209

12 wk

66

20

Miyakita (2010)

[19]

/Japan

Silodosin 8 mg

Tamsulosin 0.2 mg

65

4 w

k a

69

17

Kawabe (2006)

[20]

/Japan

Silodosin 8 mg

Tamsulosin 0.2 mg

367

12 wk

66

17

Totals and means

1799

67

18

Anticholinergics, fesoterodine plus alpha-blocker versus alpha-blocker monotherapy

Konstantinidis (2013)

[26]

/Greece

Fesoterodine 4 mg ER +/vs Tamsulosin 0.4 mg

47

4 wk

64

16

Kaplan (2011)

[25]

/Multinational

Fesoterodine 4 mg +/vs

Various

943

12 wk

66

19

Totals and means

990

66

19

Anticholinergics, solifenacin plus alpha-blocker versus alpha-blocker tamsulosin monotherapy

Van Kerrebroeck (SATURN) (2013)

[33] /

Europe Solifenacin 3–9 mg +/vs

Tamsulosin 0.4 mg OCAS

715

12 wk

65

18

Van Kerrebroeck (NEPTUNE)

[32]

(2013)/Europe Solifenacin 6–9 mg +/vs

Tamsulosin 0.4 mg OCAS

993

12 wk

65

19

Kaplan (2009)

[29]

/USA

Solifenacin 5 mg +/vs

Tamsulosin 0.4 mg

398

12 wk

65

17

Ko (2014)

[28]

/Korea

Solifenacin 5 mg +/vs

Tamsulosin 0.2 mg

187

12 wk

61

19

Lee (2014)

[30]

/Korea

Solifenacin 5 mg +/vs

Tamsulosin 0.2 mg

156

12 wk

61

18

Seo (2011)

[31] /

Korea

Solifenacin 5 mg +/vs

Tamsulosin 0.2 mg

60

12 wk

58

18

Yamaguchi (2011)

[34]

/Japan

Solifenacin 2.5–5 mg +/vs Tamsulosin 0.2 mg

638

12 wk

70

14

Totals and means

3147

66

17

Anticholinergics, tolterodine plus alpha-blocker versus alpha-blocker monotherapy

Memon (2014)

[38] /

India

Tolterodine 4 mg +/vs.

Alfuzosin 10 mg

70

12 wk

62

24

Lee (2011)

[37]

/Korea

Tolterodine 4 mg ER +/vs Doxazosin 4 mg GITS

176

12 wk

61

21

Chapple (2009)

[35] /

Multinationa

l b

Tolterodine 4 mg ER +/vs Various

652

12 wk

65

19

Kaplan (2006)

[36]

/USA

Tolterodine 4 mg ER +/vs Tamsulosin 0.4 mg

440

12 wk

61

20

Totals and means

1338

63

20

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, tadalafil versus alpha-blocker tamsulosin monotherapy

Oelke (2012)

[43]

/Multinational

Tadalafil 5 mg

Tamsulosin 0.4 mg

339

12 wk

64

17

Yokoyama (2013)

[42]

/Asia

Tadalafil 2.5–5 mg

Tamsulosin 0.2 mg

458

12 wk

63

17

Kim (2011)

[44] /

Korea

Tadalafil 5 mg

Tamsulosin 0.2 mg

100

12 wk

61

17

Singh (2014)

[41]

/India

Tadalafil 10 mg

Tamsulosin 0.4 mg

89

12 wk

61

21

Totals and means

986

63

17

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, tadalafil versus alpha-blocker monotherapy

Kumar (2014)

[45] /

India

Tadalafil 10 mg

Alfuzosin 10 mg

50

12 wk

62

18

Liguori (2009)

[46]

/Italy

Tadalafil 20 mg

(taken alternated d)

Alfuzosin 10 mg ER

43

12 wk

61

15

Totals and means

93

62

16

ER = extended release; GITS = gastrointestinal therapeutic system; I-PSS = International Prostate Symptom Score; OCAS = oral controlled absorption system;

vs = versus.

a

Crossover study, first phase presented only.

b

Includes several continents.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 5 7 0 – 5 8 1

573