Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  579 692 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 579 692 Next Page
Page Background

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data associated with this article can be

found, in the online version, at

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. eururo.2016.09.032

.

References

[1]

MacDonald R, Wilt TJ. Alfuzosin for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms compatible with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a sys- tematic review of efficacy and adverse effects. Urology 2005;66: 780–8.

[2]

MacDonald R, Wilt TJ, Howe RW. Doxazosin for treating lower urinary tract symptoms compatible with benign prostatic obstruc- tion: a systematic review of efficacy and adverse effects. BJU Int 2004;94:1263–70

.

[3]

Wilt TJ, Howe W, MacDonald R. Terazosin for treating symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction: a systematic review of efficacy and adverse effects. BJU Int 2002;89:214–25.

[4]

Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Nelson D. Tamsulosin for treating lower urinary tract symptoms compatible with benign prostatic obstruc- tion: a systematic review of efficacy and adverse effects. J Urol 2002; 167:177–83.

[5] Tacklind J, Fink HA, Macdonald R, Rutks I, Wilt TJ. Finasteride for

benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:

CD006015.

[6]

Hollingsworth JM, Wilt TJ. Lower urinary tract symptoms in men. BMJ 2014;349:g4474

.

[7] Viswanathan M, Ansari M, Berkman N, et al. Assessing the risk of

bias of individual studies in systematic reviews of health care

interventions. In: AHRQ, editor. Agency for Healthcare Research

and Quality Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews.

Rockville, MD: AHRQ; 2012. p. 1-A7.

[8]

Fu R, Gartlehner G, Grant M, et al. Conducting quantitative synthe- sis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:1187–97

.

[9]

IntHout J, Ioannidis JP, Borm GF. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik- Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightfor- ward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian- Laird method. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14:25

.

[10] The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan) Computer

program. Version 5.2. Copenhagen 2012.

[11] Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of

Interventions Version 5.1. 0. The Cochrane Collaboration.

http:// training.cochrane.org/handbook .

[12] Berkman ND, Lohr KN, Ansari M, et al. Grading the strength of a

body of evidence when assessing health care interventions for the

effective health care program of the Agency for Healthcare

Research and Quality: an update. AHRQ Publication No. 13(14)-

EHC130-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and

Quality. November 2013.

www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/

reports/final.cfm.

[13]

Pande S, Hazra A, Kundu AK. Evaluation of silodosin in comparison to tamsulosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized con- trolled trial. Indian J Pharmacol 2014;46:601–7.

[14]

Yokoyama T, Hara R, Fujii T, Jo Y, Miyaji Y, Nagai A. Comparison of two different alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists, tamsulosin and silodosin, in the treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a pro- spective randomized crossover study. Low Urin Tract Symptoms 2012;4:14–8.

[15]

Yu HJ, Lin AT, Yang SS, et al. Noninferiority of silodosin to tamsu- losin in treating patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). BJU Int 2011; 108:1843–8.

[16]

Yokoyama T, Hara R, Fukumoto K, et al. Effects of three types of alpha-1 adrenoceptor blocker on lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual function in males with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Urol 2011;18:225–30

.

[17]

Watanabe T, Ozono S, Kageyama S. A randomized crossover study comparing patient preference for tamsulosin and silodosin in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Int Med Res 2011;39:129–42

.

[18]

Chapple CR, Montorsi F, Tammela TL, et al. Silodosin therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with suspected benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled clinical trial per- formed in Europe. Eur Urol 2011;59:342–52.

[19]

Miyakita H, Yokoyama E, Onodera Y, et al. Short-term effects of crossover treatment with silodosin and tamsulosin hydrochloride for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Urol 2010;17:869–75.

[20]

Kawabe K, Yoshida M, Homma Y, Silodosin Clinical Study G. Silo- dosin, a new alpha1A-adrenoceptor-selective antagonist for treat- ing benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in Japanese men. BJU Int 2006;98:1019–24

.

[21]

Takeshita H, Moriyama S, Arai Y, et al. Randomized crossover comparison of the short-term efficacy and safety of single half- dose silodosin and tamsulosin hydrochoride in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Low Urin Tract Symptoms 2016;8:38–43.

[22]

Manjunatha R, Pundarikaksha HP, Madhusudhana HR, Amarkumar J, Hanumantharaju BK. A randomized, comparative, open-label study of efficacy and tolerability of alfuzosin, tamsulosin and silodosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Indian J Pharmacol 2016;48:134–40.

[23]

Ceylan C, Ertas K, Dogan S, Gunes ZE. The comparison alpha- blocker+M3 selective anti-muscarinic combined therapy and alpha-blocker monotherapy. J Clin Anal Med 2012;3:33–5.

[24]

Singh I, Garg G, Agarwal V. Tamsulosin and darifenacin versus tamsulosin monotherapy for BPH with accompanying overactive bladder. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:PC08–11

.

[25]

Kaplan SA, Roehrborn CG, Gong J, Sun F, Guan Z. Add-on fesoter- odine for residual storage symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder inmen receiving alpha-blocker treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms. BJU Int 2011;109:1831–40.

[26]

Konstantinidis C, Samarinas M, Andreadakis S, Xanthis S, Skriapas K. Lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: combined treatment with fesoterodine fumarate extended-release and tamsulosin—a prospective study. Urol Int 2013;90:156–60

.

[27]

MacDiarmid SA, Peters KM, Chen A, et al. Efficacy and safety of extended-release oxybutynin in combination with tamsulosin for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Mayo Clin Proc 2008; 83:1002–10

.

[28]

Ko K, Yang DY, Lee WK, Kim, et al. Effect of improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms on sexual function in men: tamsulosin monotherapy vs. combination therapy of tamsulosin and solifena- cin. Korean J Urol 2014;55:608–14

.

[29]

Kaplan SA, McCammon K, Fincher R, Fakhoury A, He W. Safety and tolerability of solifenacin add-on therapy to alpha-blocker treated men with residual urgency and frequency. J Urol 2009;182: 2825–30

.

[30]

Lee SH, Byun SS, Lee SJ, Kim KH, Lee JY. Effects of initial combined tamsulosin and solifenacin therapy for overactive bladder and blad- der outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia:

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 5 7 0 – 5 8 1

579