Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  638 692 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 638 692 Next Page
Page Background

with 13.6 mo in the placebo arm (HR: 0.63;

p

<

0.001). This

led to the recommendation that the study be halted and

unblinded. The benefit was observed regardless of age,

baseline pain intensity, and type of progression. All

secondary objectives were in favour of enzalutamide

(PSA, soft tissue response, QoL, time to PSA or objective

progression). No difference in terms of side effects was

observed in the two groups, with a lower incidence of grade

3–4 AEs in the enzalutamide arm. There was 0.6% incidence

of seizures in the enzalutamide group compared with none

in the placebo arm.

4.4.

Bone-targeting agents

Most patients with CRPC have painful bone metastases.

External beam radiotherapy is highly effective

[95]

, even as

a single fraction

[96] .

Apart from Ra 223, however, no bone-

targeted drug has been associated with improved survival.

Zoledronic acid has been used in mCRPC to reduce

skeletal-related events (SREs). This study was conducted

when no active anticancer treatments but docetaxel were

available. In total, 643 patients who had CRPC

[97]

with

bone metastases were randomised to receive zoledronic

acid, 4 or 8 mg, every 3 wk for 15 consecutive months or

placebo. The 8-mg dose was poorly tolerated and was

reduced to 4 mg but did not show a significant benefit.

However, at 15 and 24 mo of follow-up, patients treated

with 4 mg zoledronic acid had fewer SREs compared with

the placebo group (44% vs 33%;

p

= 0.021) and, in particular,

had fewer pathologic fractures (13.1% vs 22.1%;

p

= 0.015).

Furthermore, the time to first SRE was longer in the

zoledronic acid group.

The toxicity (eg, jaw necrosis) of these drugs must

always be kept in mind. Patients should have a dental

examination before starting bisphosphonate therapy. The

risk of jaw necrosis is increased by a history of trauma,

dental surgery, or dental infection, as well as by long-term

intravenous bisphosphonate administration

[98] .

Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody

directed against RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear

factor

k

B ligand), a key mediator of osteoclast formation,

function, and survival. In M0 CRPC, denosumab has been

associated with increased bone metastasis–free survival

compared with placebo (median benefit: 4.2 mo; HR:

0.85;

p

= 0.028)

[99] .

This benefit did not translate into a

survival difference (43.9 vs 44.8 mo, respectively), and

neither the US Food and Drug Administration nor the

European Medicines Agency approved denosumab for this

indication.

The efficacy and safety of denosumab (

n

= 950) com-

pared with zoledronic acid (

n

= 951) in patients withmCRPC

was assessed in a phase 3 trial

[100]

. Denosumab was

superior to zoledronic acid in delaying or preventing SREs,

as shown by time to first on-study SRE (pathologic fracture,

radiation or surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression) of

20.7 versus 17.1 mo, respectively (HR: 0.82;

p

= 0.008). Both

urinary

N

-telopeptide and bone-specific alkaline phospha-

tase were significantly suppressed in the denosumab arm

compared with the zoledronic acid arm (

p

<

0.0001). In a

recent post hoc reevaluation of end points, denosumab

showed identical results when comparing SREs and

symptomatic skeletal events

[99] .

4.5.

Palliative therapeutic options

CRPC is usually a debilitating disease, often affecting elderly

men. A multidisciplinary approach is often required with

input from urologists, medical oncologists, radiation

oncologists, nurses, psychologists, and social workers

[101]

. Critical issues of palliation must be addressed when

considering additional systemic treatment, including man-

agement of pain, constipation, anorexia, nausea, fatigue,

and depression, which often occur.

5.

Conclusions

The present text represents a summary of the EAU-ESTRO-

SIOG. For more detailed information and a full list of

references, refer to the full-text version. These guidelines

are available on the EAU Web site

( http://uroweb.org/ guideline/prostate-cancer/ )

.

Author contributions:

Philip Cornford had full access to all the data in the

study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the

accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design:

Cornford, Mottet.

Acquisition of data:

Cornford, Mottet, Bellmunt, De Santis, Joniau,

Rouvie`re, Wiegel.

Analysis and interpretation of data:

Cornford, Mottet, Bellmunt, De Santis,

Joniau, Mason, van der Poel, Rouvie`re, Wiegel.

Drafting of the manuscript:

Cornford.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content:

Cornford, Mottet, Bellmunt, Bolla, Briers, De Santis, Gross, Henry, Joniau,

Lam, Mason, van der Poel, van der Kwast, Rouvie`re, Wiegel.

Statistical analysis:

None.

Obtaining funding:

None.

Administrative, technical, or material support:

None.

Supervision:

Cornford.

Other (specify):

None.

Financial disclosures:

Philip Cornford certifies that all conflicts of

interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and

affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the

manuscript (eg, employment/ affiliation, grants or funding, consultan-

cies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties,

or patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: P. Cornford is a

company consultant for Astellas, Ipsen and Ferring. He receives company

speaker honoraria from Astellas, Janssen, Ipsen and Pfizer and

participates in trials from Ferring, and receives fellowships and travel

grants from Astellas and Janssen. Joaquim Bellmunt is a company

consultant for Janssen, Astellas, Pierre Fabre, Genentech, Merck, Ipsen,

Pfizer, Novartis and Sanofi Aventis. He has received research support

from Takeda, Novartis and Sanofi and received travel grants from Pfizer

and Pierre Fabre. Bolla has received company speaker honoraria from

Ipsen and Astellas, has received honoraria or consultation fees from

Janssen, and has received fellowship and travel grants from Janssen,

AstraZeneca and Astellas. E. Briers has received grant and research

support from Ipsen, European Association of Urology, and Bayer; is an ex

officio board member for Europa UOMO; is an ethics committee and

advisory group member for REQUITE; is a member patient advisory

board member for PAGMI; and is a member of SCA and EMA PCWP. M. De

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 6 3 0 – 6 4 2

638