Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  FM4 692 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page FM4 692 Next Page
Page Background

CONTENTS

e u r o p e a n u r o l o g y , vo l . 7 1 , n o . 4 , A p r i l 2 0 1 7

e97

The Platinum Hall of Fame http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.030

501

The Role of Urodynamics in the Evaluation of Urinary Incontinence: The European Association of Urology Recommendations in 2016

A.K. Nambiar, G.E. Lemack, C.R. Chapple, F.C. Burkhard, on behalf of the European Association of Urology

This article summarises the European Association Urology guidelines position on the

role of urodynamic studies in investigating the problem of urinary incontinence. The

guidelines recommend that urodynamics should not be necessary to help decide

the best treatment for uncomplicated urinary incontinence, but may help if there is

any uncertainty over the choice of invasive treatments. The guidelines also stress

the importance of conducting urodynamic tests to the highest possible quality

standards for the results to be useful in the decision-making process.

504

Medical Expulsive Therapy for Ureterolithiasis: The EAU Recommendations in 2016

C. Türk, T. Knoll, C. Seitz, A. Skolarikos, C. Chapple, S. McClinton, on behalf of the European

Association of Urology

The evidence on the use of -blockers as medical expulsive therapy (MET) remains

controversial when comparing findings of several meta-analyses of small, single

center RCTs against the results of large multicentric studies. Currently, patients

diagnosed with distal ureteral stones larger than 5 mmmay potentially benefit

from -blockers as MET, provided they are well informed.

508

Open Access. Open Science. Open Urology

C.E. Bayne, M.H. Hsieh

Open access means open urology and better care for our patients.

511

Generalizability of the Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT) Results to Contemporary North American Men with Prostate Cancer

D. Dalela, P. Karabon, J. Sammon, A. Sood, B. Löppenberg, Q.-D. Trinh, M. Menon, F. Abdollah

We compared the demographics and tumor characteristics of men represented in

the Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT) with contemporary

(2004–2012) US men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer using a

large nationwide tumor registry. We found that contemporary men were

significantly younger, healthier, and more likely to receive radical prostatectomy for

higher risk disease than their PIVOT counterparts and may demonstrate an overall

mortality benefit with radical prostatectomy versus observation, questioning the

generalizability of the PIVOT results.

515

Generalizability of Clinical Trials: Why It Matters for Patients and Public Policy

S. Eggener

Platinum Priorities

Brief Correspondence,

Review Articles and

Original Articles together

with the Full Length Editorials

Brief Correspondence

EAU Recommendations

PlatinumOpinion