Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  554 692 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 554 692 Next Page
Page Background

extirpative surgery. Therefore, the question arises whether

prophylactic urethrectomy may provide a prognostic

benefit in those at high risk of urethral recurrence.

At RC, urethrectomy is typically a part of the procedure in

women when OBS is not planned, whereas in men there is

no conclusive evidence to support the use of prophylactic

urethrectomy routinely at the time of RC. In men, the use of

prophylactic urethrectomy at RC was investigated in a

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis

including 2401 men treated with RC for BC

[44]

. Of these,

a total of 195 men (8.1%) underwent urethrectomy for

urethral recurrences or a malignant urethral margin as

detected by permanent histological analysis. Patients were

subdivided into two groups: immediate (within 6 wk after

RC) or delayed urethrectomy (6 wk after RC or later). As

expected, patients who underwent immediate urethrect-

omy had a higher rate of stage T4 disease compared with

those who underwent delayed urethrectomy (33% vs 16%,

p

<

0.001). Performance of immediate urethrectomy did not

confer a statistically significant survival benefit compared

with delayed urethrectomy (hazard ratio = 0.775, 95%

confidence interval: 0.59–1.01,

p

= 0.063). Nonetheless, in

our opinion, as urethrectomy is technically easy and less

time-consuming in women, those who do not receive an

OBS should undergo concurrent urethrectomy at RC to

eliminate the risk of malignant transformation of the

remnant urethral urothelium. For patients diagnosed with

urethral CIS after OBS, while urethrectomy with conversion

to a conduit diversion remains an option, a urethra-

preserving strategy with transurethral resection followed

by adjuvant BCG instillation therapy has been reported as

well

[1,43,45,46] .

In one series, intraurethral application of

BCG in six patients with CIS resulted in complete response

in five but was ineffective in patients with papillary or

invasive tumors

[47]

. There is a lack of data differentiating

between treatment options in low- and high-grade urethral

recurrences after OBS. While high-grade invasive recur-

rences in the urethra often necessitate radical surgery

[1]

, it

is the authors’ opinion that patients with low-grade or Ta

recurrences can be managed initially with resection and

intraurethral instillation therapy.

3.5.

Is there a rationale for implementing surveillance regimens

for secondary urothelial tumors?

Generally, patients with SUTs after RC have only a beneficial

long-term prognosis if tumors are detected in noninvasive

or early invasive stages

[23]

. In line with these findings, a

growing body of evidence supports the assumption that

detection of SUTs at an asymptomatic stage is associated

with prolonged survival

[46,48]

, which also translates into

significantly improved cancer-specific survival

[46]

. There-

fore, in order to improve outcomes, it is essential to firstly

understand the impact of follow-up investigations on the

detection of SUTs. In a meta-analysis of 22 retrospective

studies, it was reported that secondary UTUCs after RC were

diagnosed by routine follow-up investigations in a total of

37% of the patients

[6]

. Among these patients, tumors

were detected as a result of suspicious upper tract imaging

in 30% and positive urinary cytology in 7%. For patients

who were followed-up with cytological examinations only,

the rate was 1.8/1000 compared with 7.6/1000 for those

who also had upper urinary tract imaging during follow-up.

Thus, the incidence of secondary UTUC depends on the

modality of surveillance.

Risk factors for secondary UTUC and urethral carcinoma

are similar and reflect the propensity of the remnant

urothelium for pan-urothelial disease, for example, positive

urothelial (ureteral or urethral [including prostatic ure-

thra]) disease, CIS of the bladder, and multifocal nonmuscle

invasive disease prior to RC. As only a minority (10–20%) of

cystectomized patients exhibits (one or several of) these

risk factors it is reasonable to implement a surveillance

regimen for SUTs for this specific group of patients where

the yield of detecting SUT is increased.

3.6.

How should we survey the upper tract and urethra after

radical cystectomy?

Surveillance of the upper tract and urethra after RC aims to

monitor for oncological and functional abnormalities in

order to detect them at the earliest possible stage and confer

a therapeutic benefit. The majority of patients treated for

secondary urethral malignancy after RC presents initially

with symptoms ( 57%) and only one-third due to a positive

urinary cytology, while a minority ( 10%) undergo prophy-

lactic urethrectomy

[49]

. In this regard, it has been

demonstrated that the detection of asymptomatic urothe-

lial recurrences is associated with an approximately 30%

reduction in the risk of mortality (hazard ratio = 0.69, 95%

confidence interval: 0.59–0.79)

[50]

.

For oncological surveillance, the intensity of follow-up

regimens should depend primarily on the time since RC and

the presence of risk factors for recurrence. Secondary

urothelial tumors develop mainly in patients with histo-

logical features of panurothelial disease at RC. Given the

rarity but clinical relevance of SUTs after RC, all patients

with histologic features of panurothelial disease should be

considered for routine surveillance irrespective of number

of risk factors. Yet, as the number of risk factors has shown

to impact on the incidence of secondary urothelial tumors

[9]

the intensity of surveillance should be based on a risk-

adapted strategy

[9] .

We submit that the presence of risk

factors should be an impetus to consider a more intense

follow-up regimen for the upper tract and urethra: (1)

bladder neck (in women) and prostatic urethral involve-

ment, (2) multifocality, (3) history of nonmuscle-invasive

BC, and (4) positive ureteral and/or urethral disease on

permament sections.

Follow-up investigations should be based on history,

physical examination, urinary cytology with urethral wash-

ings in case of a retained urethra, cross-sectional imaging of

the upper tract, and when indicated, urethroscopy. Of note,

by contrast to prior series

[51]

, recent studies report on high

sensitivity and specificity rates of 80–82% and 85–97%,

respectively, of urinary cytology for the detection of

recurrences in the remnant urothelium after RC while urine

analyses by fluorescence in situ hybridization do not result

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 5 4 5 – 5 5 7

554