Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  546 692 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 546 692 Next Page
Page Background

1.

Introduction

Radical cystectomy (RC) is the mainstay of treatment for

muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BC)

[1]

. The main goal of

RC is to completely remove the tumor-bearing bladder with

negative surgical margins in order to provide optimal

cancer control. Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is considered a

pan-urothelial disease

[2] .

Therefore, the remnant urothe-

lium in the upper tracts and urethra remains at life-long risk

for recurrence after RC.

In this regard, the carcinogenesis of multifocal lesions in

UC is still controversial. According to the oligoclonal theory

or field cancerization, multifocal UC is a result of different

genomic events at different time points in the urothelium,

whereas the clonal theory considers that multifocal

urothelial tumours arise by tumor spread or implantation

in the urothelial layer and are genetically identical

[2] .

A better understanding of the cancerogenic potential of

the remnant urothelium after RC is prerequisite for any

individualized and evidence-based follow-up strategy of

patients at risk of secondary urothelial tumors (SUTs). The

present analysis aims to synthesize the available evidence

on the incidence, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of

patients with SUTs after RC in order to address the issue as

to whether it is possible to identify patients who are likely

to develop SUTs and profit from early detection and

treatment.

2.

Evidence acquisition

A systematic literature search was conducted according to

the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and

Meta-analyses statement

[3]

to identify studies reporting on

malignant diseases of the remnant urothelium after RC

between 1970 and 2016. The PubMed database was

searched along with a free-text hand search using one or

several combinations of the following items: BC, remnant,

radical cystectomy, upper urinary tract, upper tract urothe-

lial carcinoma, urethral carcinoma, upper tract recurrence,

urethral recurrence, and urothelium. A total of 1069 studies

were initially identified. The selection process was con-

ducted in three stages. The first stage was performed via

initial screening of the title to identify eligible publications

including a search of respective publications in journals not

listed in PubMed to avoid missing any eligible study. In the

second stage, publications were screened for eligibility

according to the abstracts. The third stage was performed via

full-text reading of the respective publications. For this

systematic review, we excluded: (1) non-English articles, (2)

review articles (without systematic review or meta-analy-

sis), (3) editorial reports and case reports, and (4) repeated

publications to avoid publication bias. We decided to

exclude review articles as the interpretation of published

results without systematic assessment or meta-analysis of

data does not offer significant novel insights into the issue of

diagnosis and treatment of secondary urothelial tumors.

A total of 57 papers were finally considered for evidence

synthesis

( Tables 1 and 2

). Notably, these studies are

retrospective which inevitably inherit the risk of selection

bias for which this review cannot control. A Consolidated

Standards of Reporting Trials diagram

[4]

is provided in

Figure 1 .

3.

Evidence Synthesis

3.1.

Incidence and clinicopathological risk factors for secondary

urothelial recurrences

3.1.1.

Risk factors for secondary upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Generally, secondary tumors of the upper tract are consid-

ered as late oncological events, occurring after a median of

24–36 mo after RC

[1,5] .

For this reason, it is important to

evaluate clinical and pathological risk factors which may

help to assess the intensity of follow-up. In 2012, a meta-

analysis was published

[6]

which aimed to address risk

factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after RC.

The study cohort consisted of 13 185 patients (included from

22 retrospective studies) treated with RC for BC between

1970 and 2010. The follow-up interval ranged between

0.4 mo and 349 mo and the rates of UTUC between 0.8% and

6.4%

( Table 1

). A significantly higher risk for secondary UTUC

was reported for the following subgroups: nonmuscle

invasive tumor stages and carcinoma in situ (CIS) at RC,

histologically confirmed negative lymph nodes (pN0), tumor

multifocality and history of multifocal BC, a prior history of

UTUC prior to RC, a positive ureteral or urethral margin at RC,

and the presence of low-grade tumors (G1)

[6]

. The latter

finding seems to be contraintuitive from a biological

standpoint. However, in the context of patients treated with

RC for BC those who are at low risk of cancer-related death

(ie, those with nonmuscle invasive disease) or exhibit

histological features of pan-urothelial disese (ie, CIS) are the

ones at particular risk for subsequent upper tract tumors

during the long-term follow-up compared with those who

present with advanced disease at surgery and are more likely

to die from metastatic disease which usually occurs in the

1st 2 yr after RC

[1]

. Recently, urethral margin status on

permanent section was also found to be an independent

prognosticator for metachronous UTUC

[7] ,

whereas frozen

section analysis (FSA) of the distal ureteral margin was only

associated with recurrence in univariable but not multivari-

able analysis

[8]

. Similarly, in another large retrospective

study on 1420 RC patients, CIS of the bladder, a history of

recurrent BC, nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer stage, and

tumor involvement of the distal ureter were reported to be

independently associated with the risk for secondary UTUC.

Indeed, while for the total cohort the overall rate of UTUC

was very low (0.8%), its prevalence increased to 13.5% for

patients with three to four risk factors

[9] .

3.1.2.

Risk factors for secondary urethral tumors

As for SUTs of the upper tract, the median time to secondary

urethral tumors has been reported to range between 13 mo

and 28 mo in men

[10–12]

and 30 months in women

[13]

. Secondary urethral tumors after RC are relatively rare

(incidence: 0.8–6.1%;

Table 2

) and associated with a trend

towards lower 5-yr cancer-specific survival compared with

patients without urethral tumors (63% vs 71%;

p

= 0.11)

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 5 4 5 – 5 5 7

546